References

Agathokleous, Evgenios. 2021. “Engaging in Scientific Peer Review: Tips for Young Reviewers.” Journal of Forestry Research 32 (6): 2249–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-021-01389-7.

Allen, Garland E., and Jeffrey J. W. Baker. 2017. Scientific Process and Social Issues in Biology Education. Springer Texts in Education. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44380-5.

Altman, Douglas G., and J. Martin Bland. 1995. “Statistics Notes: Absence of Evidence Is Not Evidence of Absence.” BMJ 311 (7003): 485. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7003.485.

Angler, Martin W. 2020. Telling Science Stories: Reporting, Crafting and Editing for Journalists and Scientists. Routledge.

Baglini, Rebekah, and Christine Parsons. 2020. “If You Can’t Be Kind in Peer Review, Be Neutral.” Nature Careers Community. November 30, 2020. http://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-03394-y.

Bouton, Mark E. 1993. “Context, Time, and Memory Retrieval in the Interference Paradigms of Pavlovian Learning.” Psychological Bulletin 114 (1): 80. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.80.

Chiu, Kellia, Quinn Grundy, and Lisa Bero. 2017. “‘Spin’ in Published Biomedical Literature: A Methodological Systematic Review.” PLOS Biology 15 (9): e2002173. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2002173.

Cope, Bill, Mary Kalantzis, Fouad Abd-El-Khalick, and Elizabeth Bagley. 2013. “Science in Writing: Learning Scientific Argument in Principle and Practice.” E-Learning and Digital Media 10 (4): 420–41. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2013.10.4.420.

Fontaine, Samantha S., and Kevin D. Kohl. 2020. “Gut Microbiota of Invasive Bullfrog Tadpoles Responds More Rapidly to Temperature Than a Noninvasive Congener.” Molecular Ecology 29 (13): 2449–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15487.

Ghannad, Mona, Bada Yang, Mariska Leeflang, Adrian Aldcroft, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Sara Schroter, and Isabelle Boutron. 2021. “A Randomized Trial of an Editorial Intervention to Reduce Spin in the Abstract’s Conclusion of Manuscripts Showed No Significant Effect.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 130 (February): 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.014.

Ghasemi, Asghar, Zahra Bahadoran, Parvin Mirmiran, Farhad Hosseinpanah, Niloofar Shiva, and Azita Zadeh-Vakili. 2019. “The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Discussion.” International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism 17 (3, 3). https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.95415.

Grogan, Kathleen E. 2021. “Writing Science: What Makes Scientific Writing Hard and How to Make It Easier.” The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 102 (1): e01800. https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.1800.

Heard, S. 2018. “Don’t Stop Writing in the Chasm of Despair.” Scientist Sees Squirrel. October 29, 2018. https://scientistseessquirrel.wordpress.com/2018/10/29/dont-stop-writing-in-the-chasm-of-despair/.

Höfler, Michael, John Venz, Sebastian Trautmann, and Robert Miller. 2018. “Writing a Discussion Section: How to Integrate Substantive and Statistical Expertise.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 18 (1): 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0490-1.

Ioannidis, John P. A. 2007. “Limitations Are Not Properly Acknowledged in the Scientific Literature.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 60 (4): 324–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.09.011.

Mayo-Wilson, Evan, Meredith L. Phillips, Avonne E. Connor, Kelly J. Vander Ley, Kevin Naaman, and Mark Helfand. 2021. “Peer Review Reduces Spin in PCORI Research Reports.” Research Integrity and Peer Review 6 (1): 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-021-00119-1.

McGill, Brian. 2016. “The 5 Pivotal Paragraphs in a Paper.” Dynamic Ecology. February 24, 2016. https://dynamicecology.wordpress.com/2016/02/24/the-5-pivotal-paragraphs-in-a-paper/.

McPeek, Mark A., Donald L. Deangelis, Ruth G. Shaw, Allen J. Moore, Mark D. Rausher, Donald R. Strong, Aaron M. Ellison, et al. 2009. “The golden rule of reviewing.” American Naturalist 173 (5): E155–58. https://doi.org/10.1086/598847.

Moore, Andrew. 2016. “What’s in a Discussion Section? Exploiting 2-Dimensionality in the Online World….” BioEssays 38 (12): 1185–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201600242.

Mueller, Pam A, and Daniel M Oppenheimer. 2014. “The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard: Advantages of Longhand over Laptop Note Taking.” Psychological Science 25 (6): 1159–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581.

Plaxco, Kevin W. 2010. “The Art of Writing Science.” Protein Science 19 (12): 2261. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.514.

Popper, Karl. 2005. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203994627.

Resnik, David B. 1991. “How-Possibly Explanations in Biology.” Acta Biotheoretica 39 (2): 141–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00046596.

Tinbergen, N. 1963. “On Aims and Methods of Ethology.” Zeitschrift Für Tierpsychologie 20 (4): 410–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1963.tb01161.x.

Tomaska, Lubomir. 2007. “Teaching How to Prepare a Manuscript by Means of Rewriting Published Scientific Papers.” Genetics 175 (1): 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.106.066217.

Torres, David H, and Douglas E Pruim. 2019. “Scientific Storytelling: A Narrative Strategy for Scientific Communicators.” Communication Teacher 33 (2): 107–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2017.1400679.

Toulmin, Stephen E. 2003. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.com?id=8UYgegaB1S0C.

Turbek, Sheela P., Taylor M. Chock, Kyle Donahue, Caroline A. Havrilla, Angela M. Oliverio, Stephanie K. Polutchko, Lauren G. Shoemaker, and Lara Vimercati. 2016. “Scientific Writing Made Easy: A Step-by-Step Guide to Undergraduate Writing in the Biological Sciences.” The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 97 (4): 417–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.1258.

Veronesi, Carlo. 2014. “Falsifications and Scientific Progress: Popper as Sceptical Optimist.” Lettera Matematica 1 (4): 179–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40329-014-0031-7.

Xie, Yihui. 2016. Bookdown: Authoring Books and Technical Documents with R Markdown. CRC Press.